[alto] No planned f2f meeting in Bangkok, but ...

[Vijay Gurbani]

Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.

There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead. Please
indicate which one you prefer:

1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will be
in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I
will support him or her remotely, of course.

Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event
that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will
proceed with option 1.

Thanks.

[Y. Richard Yang]

Hi Vijay, all,

I support option 1 then. Some active participants are already planning for
option 1; for example, Danny has already deferred his award scholarship to
support his travel for the next IETF (IETF 104).

Some of us are organizing weekly ALTO working meetings, and we want to
volunteer to help organize the virtual interim meeting after we reach the
decision on option 1 or option 2.

Richard

Richard

Richard

Post by Vijay Gurbani
Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.
There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead. Please
1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will
be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I
will support him or her remotely, of course.
Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event
that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will
proceed with option 1.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

[Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)]

Hello all,

I support option 1 as well.
Best regards,
Sabine


From: alto <alto-***@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 9:49 PM
To: Vijay Gurbani <***@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF ALTO <***@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [alto] No planned f2f meeting in Bangkok, but ...

Hi Vijay, all,

I support option 1 then. Some active participants are already planning for option 1; for example, Danny has already deferred his award scholarship to support his travel for the next IETF (IETF 104).

Some of us are organizing weekly ALTO working meetings, and we want to volunteer to help organize the virtual interim meeting after we reach the decision on option 1 or option 2.

Richard

Richard

Richard


On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:20 PM Vijay Gurbani <***@gmail..com<mailto:***@gmail.com>> wrote:
Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.

There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead.. Please indicate which one you prefer:

1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I will support him or her remotely, of course.

Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will proceed with option 1.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
***@ietf.org<mailto:***@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

[Qiao Xiang]

Hi Vijay and all,

I support option 1, too.


Best
Qiao


On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:57 AM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -

Post by Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Hello all,
I support option 1 as well.
Best regards,
Sabine
*Sent:* Monday, October 01, 2018 9:49 PM
*Subject:* Re: [alto] No planned f2f meeting in Bangkok, but ...
Hi Vijay, all,
I support option 1 then. Some active participants are already planning for
option 1; for example, Danny has already deferred his award scholarship to
support his travel for the next IETF (IETF 104).
Some of us are organizing weekly ALTO working meetings, and we want to
volunteer to help organize the virtual interim meeting after we reach the
decision on option 1 or option 2.
Richard
Richard
Richard
Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.
There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead.. Please
1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will
be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I
will support him or her remotely, of course.
Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event
that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will
proceed with option 1.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
--
--
=====================================
| Professor of Computer Science |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
=====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

[Danny Alex Lachos Perez]

I support option 1

Best regards,

Danny Lachos

Post by Y. Richard Yang
Hi Vijay, all,
I support option 1 then. Some active participants are already planning for
option 1; for example, Danny has already deferred his award scholarship to
support his travel for the next IETF (IETF 104).
Some of us are organizing weekly ALTO working meetings, and we want to
volunteer to help organize the virtual interim meeting after we reach the
decision on option 1 or option 2.
Richard
Richard
Richard

Post by Vijay Gurbani
Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.
There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead.. Please
1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will
be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I
will support him or her remotely, of course.
Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event
that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will
proceed with option 1.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

--
--
=====================================
| Professor of Computer Science |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
=====================================
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

[Jensen Zhang]

Hi,

I also support option 1.

Best,
Jensen

Post by Vijay Gurbani
Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.
There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead. Please
1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will
be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I
will support him or her remotely, of course.
Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event
that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will
proceed with option 1.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

[Dawn Chen]

Hi all,

I also support option 1.

Thanks,
Dawn

________________________________________
From: alto <alto-***@ietf.org> on behalf of Vijay Gurbani <***@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 12:20 AM
To: ***@ietf.org
Subject: [alto] No planned f2f meeting in Bangkok, but ...

Folks: At this time, neither Jan or I will be able to be in Bangkok.

There are a couple of ways to proceed to move the work ahead. Please indicate which one you prefer:

1/ We can hold a virtual interim meeting before the Bangkok meeting in Nov.
2/ If a f2f meeting is desirable, then someone else from the WG who will be in Bangkok can act as a temporary chair to hold the meeting. Jan and I will support him or her remotely, of course.

Please let us know which is preferable by end of this week. In the event that we don't hear from enough WG members or we reach a deadlock, we will proceed with option 1.

Thanks.