Hi Vijay, all
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM Vijay K. Gurbani <***@nokia.com>
wrote:
> Dawn: Yes, pipelining is another good reason to send the response in
> the update stream control service.
>
> This, and the other reasons I indicate in a different thread [1]
> makes me prefer option 2.
>
>
+1
Richard
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03687.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 06/11/2018 03:47 AM, Dawn Chan wrote:
> > Hi Vijay,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply, it is a good point that the result should also be
> sent in the update stream service.
> >
> > Besides, there is another point that the result should also be sent in
> the update stream service. If the server process requests asynchronously,
> when it receives the request from the client and insert it in its queue, it
> will first send a response back to the client; and after the server
> successfully processed the request, it will send a reply via the update
> stream service. This case requires the server to indicate the state of the
> âremoveâ operation in the reply. A simple attribute âstateâ with type JSON
> boolean in the UpdateStream ControlEvent can solve the concern. If "state"
> is false, the operation fails; if "state" is true, the operation succeeds..
> >
> > object {
> > [String control-uri;]
> > [Boolean state;]
> > [String remove<1..*>;]
> > } UpdateStreamControlEvent;
> >
> > This is my idea for option 2.
> >
> > Wish to hear opinions from others in the group.
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Dawn
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: alto <alto-***@ietf.org> on behalf of Y. Richard Yang <
> ***@cs.yale.edu>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 3:57:14 AM
> > To: Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US)
> > Cc: IETF ALTO
> > Subject: Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
> >
> > Dear Vijay, Jan,
> >
> > Thank you so much. It is a wonderful idea to check the WG for additional
> comments on the mentioned issues. The authors will address suggestions, if
> any, and then move the document forward.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Richard
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vijay K. Gurbani <
> ***@nokia.com<mailto:***@nokia.com>> wrote:
> > Folks: Jan and I would like to move SSE [1] to WGLC.
> >
> > Looking at the mailing list, we note that the authors are asking input
> > from the WG on an issue in SSE [2].
> >
> > We would kindly request the WG to spend some time thinking about the
> > question being asked in [2] and to chime in with some thoughts.
> >
> > Assuming that there is no response by next week on this, the authors can
> > proceed with their default position on this, for which they have an
> > articulated reason in [2].
> >
> > Jan and I will follow up next week and if there has not been any further
> > list discussion on this, we will move the work ahead to WGLC.
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/
> > [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03684.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - vijay
> > --
> > Vijay K. Gurbani / ***@nokia.com<mailto:
> ***@nokia.com>
> > Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
> > Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > alto mailing list
> > ***@ietf.org<mailto:***@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > =====================================
> > | Y. Richard Yang <***@cs.yale.edu<mailto:***@cs.yale.edu>> |
> > | Professor of Computer Science |
> > | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
> > =====================================
> >
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani / ***@nokia.com
> Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
>
--
--
=====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <***@cs.yale.edu> |
| Professor of Computer Science |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ |
=====================================